Use case

Research how companies apply IFRS

Find accounting policies and notes directly in companies' reports, and compare how different companies have handled the same question.

Below is a real example: how UPM and Stora Enso value their forests under IAS 41.

Example

Forest valuation: UPM vs Stora Enso

Quotes are from the accounting policy for biological assets in each company's FY2025 annual report (ESEF). Stora Enso files in Finnish.

Question: How do UPM and Stora Enso value their forest assets, and where do fair value changes go?

What the companies say

UPM-Kymmene

“The fair value is calculated on the basis of discounted future expected cash flows considering existing, sustainable harvesting plans and assessments regarding growth, timber prices, harvesting and silviculture costs and selling expenses.”
“Own land is stated at cost whereas leased land is valued at cost less accumulated depreciation. Any changes in the fair value of the growing forests are recognized in the operating profit in the income statement.”
UPM-Kymmene: FY2025 annual report (ESEF)

Stora Enso

“Stora Enso soveltaa painotettuja kolmivuotisia (36 kk) keskimääräisiä markkinatransaktiohintoja, joiden katsotaan sisältävän riittävän määrän transaktioita ja arvioidaan edustavan markkinaolosuhteita raportointipäivänä.”

Translation: Stora Enso applies weighted three-year (36-month) average market transaction prices, which are considered to include a sufficient number of transactions and are assessed to represent market conditions at the reporting date.

“Metsämaat arvostetaan käypään arvoon käyttämällä IAS 16 -standardissa määriteltyä uudelleenarvostusmenetelmää.”

Translation: Forest land is measured at fair value using the revaluation model defined in IAS 16.

Stora Enso: FY2025 annual report (ESEF)

The differences at a glance

TopicUPM-KymmeneStora Enso
Growing treesDiscounted expected cash flows based on harvesting plansNordic forests: 36-month weighted market transaction prices, split between trees and land on an income basis
Forest landOwn land at costFair value, IAS 16 revaluation model
Fair value changesGrowing forest changes in operating profitTree changes in the income statement, forest land changes in other comprehensive income
Fair value hierarchyLevel 3Level 3

The table summarises the passages quoted above and others in the same accounting policies. Check the details in the source. Quotes retrieved 2026-10-26. UPM-Kymmene · Stora Enso

In Clarifo

How to run the same research

Ask about the standard

Ask in plain language, for example: "How do Nordic forest companies value their forests under IAS 41?"

See peers' own answers

The answer collects peers' accounting policies and notes directly from their reports, including Finnish-language ones.

Check the source

Every point links to the page of the report, with the quoted text highlighted.

Clarifo's answer on how Microsoft recognizes Microsoft 365 revenue, with the original filing open over it and the cited passages highlighted
From an answer to the original source
Who uses this

More on this kind of work

Start a 7-day free trial.

Search filings, compare accounting policies and build source-backed analysis.

Start a free trial