COYANasdaqPharmaceutical PreparationsUS GAAP · USD

Coya Therapeutics, Inc.

Coya Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing therapies that enhance regulatory T cell (Treg) function to treat neurodegenerative, autoimmune, and metabolic diseases. Its pipeline centers on COYA 301, COYA 302, COYA 303, and exosome-based programs, with a current focus on advancing COYA 302 in ALS and FTD through clinical studies and partnering arrangements.

Revenue7.9m USD
+123.6 %y/y
Operating profit (EBIT)-22.6m USD
−30.8 %y/y
EBIT margin-283.9%
+201.5 ppy/y
Net income-21.2m USD
−42.6 %y/y
Free cash flow-10.7m USD
−4.4 %y/y

Fiscal year 2025 · change from previous year

Development 2021–2025

-30-20-10010m USD2021: EBIT -4.9 m USD20212022: 0.00 m USD2022: EBIT -9.8 m USD20222023: 6.0 m USD2023: EBIT -7.9 m USD20232024: 3.6 m USD2024: EBIT -17 m USD20242025: 7.9 m USD2025: EBIT -23 m USD20257.9-23
RevenueOperating profit (EBIT)

Business

Share of revenue
Clinical-stage Treg therapeutics100 %

Drug candidates designed to enhance regulatory T cell function in disease.

Lead program: COYA 3020 %

Combination biologic program being advanced in ALS and FTD clinical studies.

Platform programs: COYA 301 and COYA 3030 %

Backbone and follow-on programs intended for combination use and new indications.

Exosome research0 %

Preclinical work on Treg-derived exosomes as a potential therapeutic modality.

Customers

Coya does not yet sell approved products; its near-term counterparties are clinical investigators, research collaborators, and licensing partners rather than end patients. If approved, its therapies would be used by physicians treating ALS, FTD, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, autoimmune disease, and potentially metabolic disease patients. The company also relies on third-party payors and reimbursement systems for eventual commercialization.

Clinical trial patients

Patients with ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases enrolled to test safety and efficacy of COYA 302.

Pharmaceutical licensing partner

Dr. Reddy's holds commercialization rights in defined territories and supports development/commercialization of COYA 302.

Research institutions

Academic and hospital collaborators that support preclinical validation and sponsored research on exosomes and Tregs.

Future physicians and payors

Specialists and reimbursement bodies that would determine adoption and access if products are approved.

Strategy

Coya’s strategy is to build a Treg-focused pipeline across neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases, with COYA 302 as the lead clinical asset. It is also trying to extend the platform through COYA 301, COYA 303, and exosome programs while using partnerships and licensing to reduce development burden and broaden reach.

Advance COYA 302 clinical development in ALSShort term

This is the company’s principal near-term value driver and the most advanced program.

Expand COYA 302 into adjacent neurodegenerative diseasesMedium term

Broader indications could increase the commercial opportunity for the same platform.

Develop COYA 301 and COYA 303 as combination/backbone assetsMedium term

These programs are intended to create a modular pipeline and support future combinations.

Use partnerships and grants to conserve capitalShort term

The company is pre-revenue and needs external funding to extend runway and de-risk development.

Geography

Coya is headquartered in the United States and conducts its core development work there. Its disclosed commercial rights for COYA 302 span the U.S., Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom, and other ex-U.S. territories through licensing arrangements, while Japan, Mexico, and South America are also referenced in its territorial structure. Because the company is pre-commercial, geography mainly affects where trials, licensing rights, and future reimbursement pathways are concentrated.

Risks

Coya is a clinical-stage company with no approved products, so its value depends on successful trial outcomes, regulatory approvals, and eventual reimbursement. It also faces financing risk because it has ongoing losses and will need additional capital, plus execution risk from reliance on third-party licensors, manufacturers, and collaborators.

Sorted by severity
LowMediumHighLowMediumHighImpact →Likelihood →Clinical development failure1Dependence on licensed intellectual property2Manufacturing and supply-chain dependence4Reimbursement and market-access uncertainty5
Impact is the risk’s severity and likelihood how probable it is over the next few years, both assessed from the company’s reports. Numbers match the list.
  1. Clinical development failureImpact: CriticalLikelihood: Medium

    COYA 302 and other programs are investigational and may not show efficacy or safety in later studies.

    Exposure: ALSTARS Phase 2 and future neurodegenerative indications

  2. Dependence on licensed intellectual propertyImpact: HighLikelihood: Medium

    Key programs rely on third-party licenses; termination or unfavorable terms could impair the pipeline.

    ExposureTreg technologyDRL_ABOther in-licensed assets
  3. Financing and going-concern riskImpact: High

    The company has recurring losses and will need substantial additional capital to continue development.

    ExposureEquity raisesDebtCollaborationsStrategic transactions
  4. Manufacturing and supply-chain dependenceImpact: MediumLikelihood: Medium

    Programs depend on specialized vendors and equipment for cell therapy and exosome work.

    ExposureTerumo BCTRepligenMalvernIzonThermoFisherApplied Biosystems
  5. Reimbursement and market-access uncertaintyImpact: MediumLikelihood: Medium

    Even if approved, uptake will depend on coverage, pricing, and payor acceptance.

    Exposure: Physician-administered specialty therapies in the U.S. and abroad

Accounting

Judgemental items
Collaboration revenue recognition

Revenue is derived from the DRL Development Agreement and includes license and service components recognized over time or upon triggering events.

Impact: Can cause lumpy quarterly revenue and margin volatility

Accrued research and development expenses

Management estimates unpaid clinical, preclinical, and vendor costs at period end.

Impact: Affects operating expenses and current liabilities

Stock-based compensation valuation

Fair value depends on assumptions such as volatility and discount for lack of marketability.

Impact: Can materially affect G&A and R&D expense

Going-concern assessment

Persistent losses and funding needs require management to assess liquidity and disclosure.

Impact: Important for evaluating runway and capital risk

Publicly listed companies with a comparable business focus.

Last updated: 24/09/2026