Nasdaq CopenhagenIFRS · DKK

Copenhagen Infrastructure V USD Feeder SCSp

Copenhagen Infrastructure V USD Feeder SCSp is a Luxembourg-domiciled feeder investment vehicle associated with Copenhagen Infrastructure V, structured to channel investor capital into the underlying infrastructure fund. It is set up as a special limited partnership and is used to participate in infrastructure investments through the master fund structure.

Revenue11.2m DKK
+226.7 %y/y
Operating profit (EBIT)11.1m DKK
+223.1 %y/y
EBIT margin98.8%
−2.9 ppy/y
Net income11.1m DKK
+223.5 %y/y

Fiscal year 2025 · change from previous year

Development 2024–2025

-10-5051015m DKK2024: -8.9 m DKK2024: EBIT -9.0 m DKK20242025: 11 m DKK2025: EBIT 11 m DKK20251111
RevenueOperating profit (EBIT)

Business

Share of revenue
Feeder fund vehicle100 %

Investor capital is collected in the feeder and passed into the underlying infrastructure fund structure.

Customers

The fund serves professional and institutional investors that want exposure to infrastructure assets through a managed fund structure. Investors buy into the feeder because it provides access to the Copenhagen Infrastructure platform and a USD-denominated entry point into the strategy.

Institutional investors

Pension funds, insurers, endowments and similar allocators buying fund interests for infrastructure exposure.

Professional asset allocators

Family offices and other sophisticated investors using the feeder for managed access to the strategy.

USD investors

Investors preferring a USD-denominated vehicle to reduce currency mismatch at the fund entry level.

Strategy

The vehicle’s role is to provide a clean capital-raising and investment channel into the Copenhagen Infrastructure V strategy. Its structure is designed to simplify investor access, maintain currency denomination consistency, and route subscriptions into the underlying infrastructure portfolio.

Maintain efficient fund accessShort term

The feeder exists to streamline subscriptions into the underlying infrastructure vehicle.

Support investor alignmentMedium term

A feeder structure can reduce administrative friction for allocators seeking exposure through a single entry point.

Geography

The available filing identifies the vehicle as Denmark-linked, but the underlying operating geography is not disclosed in the excerpt provided. As a feeder fund, geographic exposure is primarily determined by the portfolio of the underlying infrastructure investments rather than by physical operations of its own.

Risks

The main risks are structural and market-based: returns depend on the performance, valuation and cash generation of the underlying infrastructure portfolio, while fund-level results can also be affected by fair-value movements and investment timing. For investors, currency, liquidity and fund-structure complexity are the key considerations in a feeder vehicle like this.

Sorted by severity
LowMediumHighLowMediumHighImpact →Likelihood →Underlying portfolio valuation risk1Liquidity and redemption constraints2Currency mismatch3
Impact is the risk’s severity and likelihood how probable it is over the next few years, both assessed from the company’s reports. Numbers match the list.
  1. Underlying portfolio valuation riskImpact: HighLikelihood: High

    Feeder results depend on the fair value and performance of the underlying infrastructure assets.

    Exposure: Fund-level NAV and investor returns

  2. Liquidity and redemption constraintsImpact: HighLikelihood: Medium

    Closed-end infrastructure structures typically limit investor liquidity and timing flexibility.

    Exposure: Investor exit terms and capital lock-up

  3. Currency mismatchImpact: MediumLikelihood: Medium

    The feeder is USD-denominated while the broader structure may hold assets and liabilities in other currencies.

    Exposure: FX translation and investor matching

Ask Clarifo about Copenhagen Infrastructure V USD Feeder SCSp

Accounting

Judgemental items
Fair value through profit or loss

The excerpt references financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, which can move reported results significantly.

Impact: NAV and profit volatility

Initial recognition of investments

The filing mentions fair value on initial recognition and direct transaction costs.

Impact: Entry valuation and upfront cost treatment

Publicly listed companies with a comparable business focus.

Last updated: 24/10/2026

Copenhagen Infrastructure V USD Feeder SCSp Revenue, Earnings & Financials 2025 – Clarifo