Bone Biologics Corp
Bone Biologics Corp is a U.S.-based clinical-stage medical device company focused on bone regeneration for spinal fusion procedures. Its core technology is NELL-1, a recombinant human protein licensed exclusively from UCLA Technology Development Group and combined with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) to create the NB1 bone graft device. The company’s development program is centered on improving bone growth and fusion outcomes while avoiding the need for autograft harvest from a patient’s hip. Bone Biologics has not yet commercialized its lead product and is pursuing FDA approval through the premarket approval pathway for a combination device/drug product.
Fiscal year 2025 · change from previous year
Development 2020–2025
Business
Share of revenueNB1 combines NELL-1 with DBM to support targeted bone regeneration in spinal fusion.
NELL-1 is the underlying biologic technology used to stimulate bone formation.
Preclinical and human studies aimed at proving safety and effectiveness for FDA approval.
Exclusive worldwide rights to UCLA-licensed NELL-1 patents and know-how.
Customers
Bone Biologics’ eventual customers are primarily spine surgeons and the hospitals or surgical centers that use bone graft products in spinal fusion procedures. The end patient population includes adults with degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, and other spinal conditions that require fusion surgery. The company also depends on healthcare providers and third-party payors because they influence product adoption, reimbursement, and clinical use after approval. Until commercialization, its direct customer base is limited, and the business is still focused on generating clinical evidence that would persuade surgeons and payors to adopt NB1 over autograft or other biologics.
They would use NB1 in lumbar spinal fusion to improve bone growth and avoid autograft harvest.
They would purchase or stock the product for fusion procedures if it gains approval and surgeon adoption.
They are the clinical beneficiaries of the product, especially those undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
They affect reimbursement and therefore the commercial viability of any approved product.
Strategy
The company’s strategy is to advance NELL-1/DBM through clinical development and obtain FDA approval for spinal fusion use. It is positioning NB1 as a target-specific bone regeneration product with a safety and efficacy profile intended to compete with autograft, the current benchmark in spine fusion. A key part of the strategy is building clinical evidence through a multicenter pilot study and then progressing toward a pivotal U.S. trial. The company also relies on its exclusive UCLA license and patent portfolio to protect the technology and create barriers to entry.
Regulatory approval is the main gating factor before any commercialization can begin.
The company has been told the product will be regulated as a combination product requiring PMA in the U.S.
Exclusive patents and licenses are central to competitive differentiation and future partnering value.
Geography
Bone Biologics is headquartered in the United States and is organized as a Delaware corporation with operations tied to U.S. regulatory and intellectual property systems. Its lead clinical study is being conducted in Australia, which gives the company an international development footprint even though commercialization is expected to depend heavily on U.S. FDA approval. The company’s technology license is described as worldwide, so the long-term opportunity is not limited to one geography. In practice, however, the business is still concentrated in the U.S. regulatory environment and in clinical development markets where spinal fusion trials can be run.
Risks
Bone Biologics faces the typical risks of a clinical-stage medtech company: regulatory delay, clinical trial failure, and uncertainty over whether the product will demonstrate sufficient safety and effectiveness for approval. Because NB1 is expected to require a PMA, the approval process is longer and more demanding than for many device products, and any setback could materially delay commercialization. The company also depends on a small management team and on third-party manufacturing and supply inputs, which increases execution risk. More broadly, it competes against large orthopedic and med-tech companies with greater resources, and its future market access will depend on surgeon adoption, reimbursement, and compliance with healthcare fraud, privacy, and other regulations.
- Regulatory approval riskImpact: CriticalLikelihood: Medium
NB1 is expected to require FDA PMA approval before U.S. commercialization, which is time-consuming and uncertain.
Exposure: Lead product commercialization
- Clinical trial execution riskImpact: HighLikelihood: Medium
The company is still generating evidence in pilot studies, and adverse results could stop or delay development.
Exposure: NB1 spinal fusion program
- Competitive pressureImpact: HighLikelihood: Medium
Large orthopedic and med-tech companies may launch better-funded or faster-approved alternatives.
Exposure: Spinal fusion biologics market
- Supply chain and manufacturing dependenceImpact: MediumLikelihood: Medium
Third parties provide raw materials and product components, which can constrain trials and future supply.
Exposure: Clinical and future commercial supply
- Key person dependenceImpact: MediumLikelihood: Low
The company states it is heavily dependent on its CEO and CFO, making turnover disruptive.
Exposure: Corporate execution
- Healthcare compliance and privacyImpact: MediumLikelihood: Low
Anti-kickback, HIPAA, and related laws can restrict commercialization and create liability.
Exposure: Commercial launch and provider relationships
Accounting
Judgemental itemsFair value estimates for equity awards and warrants can materially affect reported expenses and equity.
Impact: Non-cash compensation and derivative-like valuation effects
As a loss-making development company, the realizability of deferred tax assets is highly judgmental.
Impact: Tax expense and balance sheet deferred tax assets
R&D and trial-related costs are recognized as incurred, creating volatility across periods.
Impact: Quarterly operating loss comparability
ATM and public offerings affect cash, share count, and potential dilution.
Impact: Capital structure and per-share metrics
Similar listed companies
Publicly listed companies with a comparable business focus.
BioRestorative Therapies, Inc.
BRTX · Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC
FibroBiologics, Inc.
FBLG · Pharmaceutical Preparations
Globus Medical, Inc
GMED · Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus
Globus Medical is a U.S.-based medical device company focused on musculoskeletal care, with products used in spine, orthopedic trauma, hip, knee, extremity and neurosurgical procedures.
Celularity Inc
CELU · Pharmaceutical Preparations
MiMedx Group, Inc
MDXG · Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus
MIMEDX Group develops and commercializes regenerative biologic products used by clinicians to treat chronic wounds, burns, and surgical applications.
BioAtla, Inc.
BCAB · Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Last updated: 24/09/2026