AMODNasdaqPatent Owners & LessorsUS GAAP · USD

Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc

Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based intellectual property company that appears to focus on owning and monetizing patents through licensing arrangements rather than selling physical products. The company’s public filings reference an Intellectual Property License Agreement (e.g., with GZ6G Technologies Corp.), indicating a business model centered on granting rights to use IP in exchange for fees and/or royalties. As a small public company, it has also relied on financing activities (including promissory notes and equity issuances) to fund operations and pursue its IP strategy. Its economics are therefore driven by the ability to source/maintain enforceable IP, negotiate license terms, and collect cash from counterparties.

Revenue0.0m USD
Operating profit (EBIT)-5.2m USD
−528.1 %y/y
EBIT margin-73,468.6%
Net income-8.0m USD
−295.5 %y/y
Free cash flow-3.2m USD

Fiscal year 2025 · change from previous year

Development 2021–2025

-6-4-202m USD2021: EBIT -0.59 m USD20212022: EBIT -1.5 m USD20222023: EBIT -2.9 m USD20232024: EBIT -0.83 m USD20242025: 0.01 m USD2025: EBIT -5.2 m USD20250.01-5.2
RevenueOperating profit (EBIT)

Business

Share of revenue
Intellectual property licensing70 %

Granting rights to use patents/IP under license agreements for fees and/or royalties.

IP portfolio acquisition and development15 %

Purchasing, maintaining, and developing patent assets to expand future licensing opportunities.

IP enforcement and settlement monetization10 %

Pursuing infringement claims, settlements, or structured resolutions to monetize IP rights.

Other advisory/partnership activities5 %

Commercialization partnerships and other IP-related services that may accompany licensing.

Customers

Alpha Modus’ customers are primarily organizations that need legal rights to use specific technologies covered by the company’s patents, typically via negotiated license agreements. Counterparties may include technology developers, product manufacturers, and service providers that want to reduce litigation risk and secure freedom-to-operate. The company may also transact with IP ecosystem participants (e.g., technology partners) where licensing is bundled with collaboration or commercialization arrangements. Because licensing is contract-driven, customer concentration can be high, and revenue timing may depend on the execution of a small number of agreements and the collectability of receivables.

Technology and product companies (licensees)

Buy patent licenses to legally use covered technologies and reduce litigation exposure.

Strategic technology partners

Enter licensing and collaboration arrangements to commercialize IP in specific applications.

Dispute-resolution counterparties

Settle asserted IP claims through paid-up licenses or structured royalty arrangements.

Geography

Alpha Modus is headquartered in the United States and reports as a U.S. SEC registrant. The available excerpts do not provide an authoritative revenue-by-geography table or country-level revenue disclosures, so the geographic revenue mix cannot be quantified from the provided material. Operationally, an IP licensing model can be global because licensees and alleged infringers may be located in multiple jurisdictions, but enforcement and contracting are often anchored in U.S. legal venues and U.S.-domiciled counterparties. Geographic exposure therefore tends to show up through jurisdictional enforceability of patents, cross-border collections, and legal/regulatory differences in IP regimes.

Risks

Alpha Modus faces business-model risk typical of patent monetization companies: licensing revenue can be lumpy, dependent on a small number of negotiations, and sensitive to counterparties’ willingness to sign and pay. Legal and regulatory risks are material because patent validity, enforceability, and litigation outcomes can change expected cash flows and require significant upfront costs. The excerpts also show reliance on debt/equity financing (including note conversions and share issuances), which can create dilution, refinancing risk, and going-concern pressure if licensing cash flows do not ramp. Finally, as a small public company, it is exposed to key-person risk and execution risk in sourcing IP, structuring agreements, and managing disputes.

Sorted by severity
Equity dilution and financing dependenceHigh

Filings describe multiple unregistered share issuances and note conversions, indicating reliance on capital markets and potential dilution if cash inflows from licensing are insufficient.

ExposurePromissory notesNote conversionsStock-based compensationUnregistered issuances
Uncertain outcomes and costs in IP enforcementHigh

Patent monetization often requires negotiation and potentially disputes; adverse rulings or high legal costs can reduce or eliminate expected licensing/settlement proceeds.

Accounting

Judgemental items
ASC 606 revenue recognition for IP licenses

License contracts may include upfront fees, milestones, or royalties with different recognition triggers.

Impact: Can materially change timing of revenue and margins by quarter

Stock-based compensation and equity issued for services

Filings describe share issuances to directors, executives, and service providers valued at market prices.

Impact: Increases non-cash compensation expense and affects comparability

Promissory notes, amendments, and conversions

Note conversions into shares and amendments can create non-cash interest and complex classification/measurement.

Impact: Affects interest expense, equity, and potential EPS dilution

Publicly listed companies with a comparable business focus.

Last updated: 24/09/2026